tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-75048338046749875892024-02-02T09:44:12.834+00:00Masculinity in the MatriarchyMasculinity is a state of mind prepared to defend the patriarchal moral principles required to maintain a patriarchy ie the social conservatism of marriage and family values. Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-76475406728526521142024-01-10T20:56:00.001+00:002024-01-10T20:56:40.174+00:00Vincent Bruno and I argue about the role of theology in framing the narrative<iframe allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="true" frameborder="0" height="314" scrolling="no" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=314&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fclaire.khaw%2Fvideos%2F362465803069061%2F&show_text=false&width=560&t=0" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" width="560"></iframe><div><br /></div><div>Mathilde Ludendorff</div><div><a href="https://scientificnordicpaganism.blogspot.com/2024/01/mathilde-ludendorff-is-too.html">https://scientificnordicpaganism.blogspot.com/2024/01/mathilde-ludendorff-is-too.html</a></div><div><br /></div><div>3:00 Your religious group</div><div>4:00 Sacrificing for posterity</div><div>5:00 Principled martyrdom</div><div>6:00 Nordic and non-Nordic people</div><div>7:00 Non-whites are mostly happy with their religion.</div><div>8:00 Christianity causes white people pain.</div><div>10:00 Monotheism represents the muting of ideological diversity.</div><div>11:00 Differentiation of the white race</div><div>12:00 Individualism v cooperation</div><div>13:00 Hinduism is not monotheistic.</div><div>14:00 Do white people suffer more than brown people over their religion?</div><div>15:00 Christianity v Islam</div><div>16:00 White people would be more likely to be polytheistic than Arabs.</div><div>17:00 Paganism in Nazi Germany</div><div>The Trinity</div><div><a href="https://quantumtorah.com/cosmology-and-the-tetragrammaton/">https://quantumtorah.com/cosmology-and-the-tetragrammaton/</a></div><div>20:00 Solo, duo, trio, quartet, quintet, sextet, septet, octet, nonet and decet</div><div>22:00 The Abrahamic God</div><div>23:00 Matilde Ludendorff was too nasty for the Nazis.</div><div>25:00 Erich Ludendorff didn't want Hitler's eastward expansion.</div><div>26:00 Hitler was more pragmatic and moderate.</div><div>27:00 Mein Kampf was Hitler pretending Nazism was motherhood and apple pie.</div><div>28:00 The Trimurti</div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trimurti">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trimurti</a> </div><div>30:00 One stop shopping</div><div>31:00 The Supreme Being is less complicated than a pantheon.</div><div>33:00 A choice of therapists</div><div>Cult abuse</div><div>34:00 Our isolation because of our interest in theology</div><div>35:00 Chatgpt</div><div>35:00 Forgiveness</div><div>37:00 People prefer forgiving people to vindictive people. </div><div>38:00 Anti-gay religions</div><div>39:00 The acausal realm</div><div>40:00 Jews</div><div>43:00 The Abrahamic God makes the most sense.</div><div>44:00 The miraculous nature of the Koran</div><div>45:00 Third Principle of Judaism</div><div>46:00 Cunning Jews</div><div>47:00 Eviscerating the Trinity</div><div>48:00 Lied to by Jehovah's Witness</div><div>50:00 Demonic possession</div><div>52:00 Anti-psychiatry</div><div>53:00 Mental illness</div><div>54:00 Vincent demonically possessed</div><div>56:00 Witchcraft</div><div>59:00 Molech</div><div>1:00:00 Paterfamilias</div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias</a></div><div>1:02:00 Disability</div><div><a href="https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html">https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html</a></div><div><a href="https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/02/what-i-propose-is-already-being-done.html">https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/02/what-i-propose-is-already-being-done.html</a></div><div>1:17:00 Gay and straight people</div><div>1:18:00 Moral superiority</div><div>1:20:00 More gay people are atheists.</div><div>1:21:00 Zoroastrianism</div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism#Eschatology:_Renovation_and_judgment">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism#Eschatology:_Renovation_and_judgment</a></div><div>1:23:00 The Abrahamic religions are more organised than Zoroastrianism.</div><div>1:25:00 Satan is God's Prosecuting Counsel and agent provocateur.</div><div>1:26:00 The Abrahamic God is more in control than the Ahura Mazda.</div><div>1:30:00 Ahura Mazda</div><div><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Zoroastrianism/comments/137csyj/how_does_ahura_mazda_differ_from_the_abrahamic_god/">https://www.reddit.com/r/Zoroastrianism/comments/137csyj/how_does_ahura_mazda_differ_from_the_abrahamic_god/</a></div><div>1:32:00 The status system of the Abrahamic God</div><div>1:34:00 Choose the best moral system available.</div><div>1:36:00 People who want to start their own religion</div><div>1:37:00 We have a duty to minimise suffering.</div><div>1:39:00 Vincent is agnostic.</div><div>1:44:00 The status of Jews</div><div>1:45:00 Adam Green </div><div>1:46:00 Religion maintains sexual morality.</div><div>1:47:00 Secular Jews and gentiles v Religious Jews and gentiles</div><div>1:50:00 Snorkelblog</div><div>1:51:00 Paul and Caesar's Messiah</div><div>1:52:00 Constantine the Great</div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great</a></div><div>1:55:00 The Trinity is easily undermined by Jews. </div><div>1:57:00 A new religion is required after half a century of free love and feminism.</div><div>2:00:00 Secular Koranism is only interested in the Commandments of Allah capable of being made into legislation.</div><div>2:03:00 Vincent is tired and sad.</div><div>2:05:00 Vincent regrets.</div><div>2:07:00 Vincent's college education interrupted</div><div>2:10:00 Women find it easier to get laid than men.</div><div>Men should only be allowed to have sex with their wives or prostitutes.</div><div>2:11:00 We all have to make sacrifices.</div><div>2:13:00 Announcements</div><div>2:16:00 Jon Vance</div><div>2:18:00 Changing the narrative</div><div>2:20:00 Vincent's specialised knowledge</div><div>2:21:00 Vincent and I are both known in the Dissident Right on both sides of the Atlantic.</div><div>2:22:00 The narrative of repentance</div><div>2:27:00 Millenniyule</div>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-71286268447058879782022-08-15T13:47:00.001+01:002022-08-15T13:47:29.306+01:00How Conservative Americans can draw the attention of Donald Trump to Secular Koranism<a href="https://www.45office.com/info/share-your-thoughts">https://www.45office.com/info/share-your-thoughts</a><div><br /></div><div><div>If I could, I would make my comment a series of questions. </div><div><br /></div><div>1. Is Christianity as a moral system operational in America?</div><div><br /></div><div>2. How can we tell if Christianity is operational in America?</div><div><br /></div><div>3. If Christianity is operational in America, wouldn't some Christian principles be in force?</div><div><br /></div><div>4. What is a Christian principle that all Christians can agree on?</div><div><br /></div><div>5. Is the Christian principle unique to Christianity the Doctrine of the Trinity requiring Christians to worship Jesus as the co-equal of the God of Israel who is also Allah?</div><div><br /></div><div>6. Isn't the Trinity idolatry if idolatry is the worship of anything that isn't God?</div><div><br /></div><div>7. Didn't God forbid idolatry in the Old Testament?</div><div><br /></div><div>8. Are Christians by worshiping Jesus angering and offending God by equating Him with a convicted blasphemer executed for blaspheming against Himself?</div><div><br /></div><div>9. Is respect for marriage and family values what all the world religions have in common with each other?</div><div><br /></div><div>10. If all the world religions including Christianity are supposed to respect the practice of marriage, isn't Christianity the weakest link for letting in liberalism which means nothing more in the 21st century than sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting?</div><div><br /></div><div>11. Are members of the liberal establishment bad parents and the badly parented offspring of liberal parents?</div><div><br /></div><div>12. What is the percentage of illegitimacy in America now?</div><div><br /></div><div>13. Are these numbers electorally significant?</div><div><br /></div><div>14. Would any democratic politician hoping to win an election dare to offend so many parents of illegitimate offspring and so many badly parented bastards of unmarried parents who would be treated as sex offenders by <a href="https://quran.com/24/2">https://quran.com/24/2</a>?</div><div><br /></div><div>15. Is the only way of restoring the patriarchy in America the legal enforcement of 24:2?</div><div><br /></div><div>16. If the problem of widespread illegitimacy is not immediately addressed, is the problem of bad government and corrupt politicians going to continue worsening? </div><div><br /></div><div>17. What else other than sharia would morally regenerate America?</div><div><br /></div><div>18. If it is impossible to persuade enough US voters to support the shaming of unmarried parents, then there is no need to delay in pointing out the problem that will not be solved by democracy, is there?</div><div><br /></div><div>19. Is the First Amendment based on <a href="https://quran.com/2/256">https://quran.com/2/256</a> of the Koran?</div><div><br /></div><div>20. Was the American Republic in fact founded on Islamic principles?</div><div><br /></div><div>21. Isn't it time Americans went back to their roots by taking the intermediate step of adopting Secular Koranism? <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV">https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV</a></div></div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sFXwYX7TO38" width="320" youtube-src-id="sFXwYX7TO38"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7Le4FAXx-ls" width="320" youtube-src-id="7Le4FAXx-ls"></iframe></div>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-10764761343851806902021-10-30T15:00:00.003+01:002021-10-30T15:00:53.513+01:00Poppy Mania Day prevents any rational and impartial analysis of the insanity of UK foreign policy for the past 100 years<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/BBCr4today">@BBCr4today</a> Poppy Mania Day sanctifies British foreign policy, no matter how egregious.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531732634305835009">November 10, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/KateHoeyMP">@KateHoeyMP</a> Britain lost her empire because a Liberal PM thought a war would make his party more likely to win the 2015 General Election.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531512340773347328">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/heritage_sites">@heritage_sites</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteMughalsFan">@WhiteMughalsFan</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/FalconerBrian">@FalconerBrian</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Harryslaststand">@Harryslaststand</a> Democracy caused a Liberal PM to lose Britain its empire.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531515948969508865">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">A liberal politician seeking electoral advantage was responsible for the fall of the British empire.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531546251364679680">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Asquith <a href="http://t.co/PTR7kBJ23H">http://t.co/PTR7kBJ23H</a><br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531547239605624832">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> WW2 was a continuation of WW1, was it not? So let us examine what WW1 was all about. Wasn't even about Belgian neutrality.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531548412400132096">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> The German Ambassador couldn't believe the British were going to war over "a scrap of paper" ie the Treaty of London 1839.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531548721218334721">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><p><br /><a href="http://www.scottmanning.com/content/treaty-of-london-1839/">http://www.scottmanning.com/content/treaty-of-london-1839/</a><br />Can you find any word in the Treaty of London that <i>obliged </i>Britain to go to war against Germany? I can't.<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Kingdom_general_elections">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Kingdom_general_elections</a><br /><br /></p><blockquote class="tr_bq">The Parliament Act 1911 reduced the maximum life of a Parliament from seven years to five, however the election that would have been due by 1915 as a result of the Act was not held due to World War I (1914-1918)</blockquote><p><br /></p><blockquote class="tr_bq">At this point, the Representation of the People Act 1918 gave suffrage to most of the adult population (men over 21, women over 30).</blockquote><p><br />That was when the thin end of the wedge of feminism was inserted.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9602114/The-First-World-War-the-war-that-changed-us-all.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9602114/The-First-World-War-the-war-that-changed-us-all.html</a><br /><br /></p><blockquote class="tr_bq">Gone was the expansive optimism of those Edwardian years, with ludicrously young men bowling up to recruitment offices, broad grins on their faces, as they stood on tiptoe and stuck their chests out to appear older.<br /><br />In its place came the horror – and the cynicism. Towards the end of the war, officers noticed that men stopped singing the morale-boosting songs they had invented themselves and were reduced instead to the miserable, characteristically English, downbeat cry of “<span style="font-size: large;">We’re here because we’re here because we’re here.”</span></blockquote><p><br /><br /></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgss5XzsktDj8Ra2-mkSe06PwAVWq7DgjQrgLfN9MDGrQ3qxqi-H8N70v4i3laS2tsUYHx6p-uErxXU-YdJQL91vPCEMNLbyhy898EHaTTj2zxq6i0X17Nm2ecA4b3bqDlkYZ5uW0fO9XE/s1600/home+by+Xmas+WW1.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgss5XzsktDj8Ra2-mkSe06PwAVWq7DgjQrgLfN9MDGrQ3qxqi-H8N70v4i3laS2tsUYHx6p-uErxXU-YdJQL91vPCEMNLbyhy898EHaTTj2zxq6i0X17Nm2ecA4b3bqDlkYZ5uW0fO9XE/s1600/home+by+Xmas+WW1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption"><span style="background-color: white; color: #404040; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11px; line-height: 15.18px;">'We’ll be home by Christmas’: the departure of the 1st Battalion of the Mid-Kent Volunteers for the front from Royal Tunbridge Wells in 1914</span><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: #404040; font-family: "arial"; font-size: 11px; line-height: 15.18px;"><br /></span></td></tr></tbody></table><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> The British thought their boys would be home by Christmas. <a href="http://t.co/gWY4D7Eesx">http://t.co/gWY4D7Eesx</a><br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531549259704057856">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Everyone has a theory, but I am saying democracy is what caused the break up of the British empire.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531551015724912641">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Of course, the British want to think it was all worth it. I am saying it ain't.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531551181211176961">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> If one went to the trouble of acquiring an empire, one might as well hang on to it as long as possible. Libtards don;t get it.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531552472503185408">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Because the British lost their empire so carelessly, they hv bn busily now convincing themselves they are better off without it<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531552756084273152">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> I know libtards have long convinced themselves that it was a wicked thing to have. Sour grapes and all that.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531552932580560897">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Empires are just an objective measure of human achievement but I know libtards just don't care.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531553137174544384">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> No point crying over spilt milk, is what the libtard thinks. Better to think they never should have had it in the first place.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531553322239791105">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> And how is it calculated and who by? Libtard politicians and libtard accountants and libtard historians<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531553552137986049">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> The sight of British servicemen who were PoWs of the Japanese emerging emaciated and skeletal lost them their authority.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531554226976333825">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> No longer perceived to be the masters of the universe, face-saving granting of independence was the only option.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531554462213877760">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> I was just pointing out earlier today that the inmates of Belsen etc emerged in the same emaciated state as Japanese PoWs.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531555514313109504">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjC_QqIkv7gMAOEpIqinxIiwv59WdqSvLSyj5bFpBhDpIvT3jM_SZxLz3qqiaYPuxK0vjHL9eO8k2nvMkyR5IjI48NfXYcszq9ErYURJDNzAzPIHRWfAP_G1UiEQv1e614dCETea5YZaog/s1600/pow_manila-pows.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjC_QqIkv7gMAOEpIqinxIiwv59WdqSvLSyj5bFpBhDpIvT3jM_SZxLz3qqiaYPuxK0vjHL9eO8k2nvMkyR5IjI48NfXYcszq9ErYURJDNzAzPIHRWfAP_G1UiEQv1e614dCETea5YZaog/s1600/pow_manila-pows.jpg" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption"><a href="http://www.lchs.museum/ww2/pow.htm">http://www.lchs.museum/ww2/pow.htm</a></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br /><script async="" charset="utf-8" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><br /></p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> There was a war on, and prisoners would be the last to get fed, as you would expect. An army marches on its stomach.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531555646161039360">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Asquith thinking he was fighting a short and successful war was what made him do it, but he lost the British their empire.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531559805782343680">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Every war is gamble but 2 the British the most militaristic nation in the world every war was a PARTY n Britain was a Party Girl<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531560121298870276">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/Smithy0364">@Smithy0364</a> Party girls can party too much and get knocked up and lose their reputations and fortune "partying"with just anyone who asks her<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531560382205538304">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><p><br /></p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">100 years later, THE PROHIBITION REMAINS against historians saying what they think really caused Britain to enter two ruinous world wars.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531401642101727232">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">100 years later, the British are nowhere near acknowledging what caused their government to lose their empire in two throws of the dice.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531401953910472704">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">100 years later, the prohibition against historians discussing how the British came to lose their world empire has become even stronger.<br />— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) <a href="https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/531402365682081792">November 9, 2014</a></blockquote><p><br />THE KHAVIAN ANALYSIS OF HOW BRITAIN LOST ITS EMPIRE<br /><br />Because the British ended up destroying their greatest achievement after their reckless participation in two world wars, run on a policy of being nasty to the Germans because they were perceived to be rivals, they had to and still now make themselves believe that it was all worthwhile (because they had to save the Jews or that Hitler would have invaded Britain) because otherwise the truth would be too much to bear. ("The horror, the horror.")<br /><br />This brings to mind a game of Monopoly I once played. My opponent tried to thwart my acquisitions by buying up properties he knew I wanted, but in the end found himself so denuded of cash that he could not make the most of his opportunities or pay the rent when he landed on my low-grade hotels in Old Kent Road and the Whitechapel Road.<br /><br />No sensible German military leader would have taken the trouble to invade Britain because it was a maritime nation with a navy enormously superior to Germany's. The cost would be ruinous and any victory Pyrrhic. Besides, the Germans wanted to expand eastwards towards Russia, not take on a maritime nation by mounting a blockade with its inferior navy.<br /><br />As for saving the Jews, the British themselves were not too fond of them, if truth be told, and neither were the French or the Poles or the Russians or the Italians etc.<br /><br />I know Irving is denounced as being a Holocaust Denier, but it is probably because he points out so many uncomfortable truths. It has been pointed out that all the Nazis did was just conduct yet another of the pogroms European Christians periodically mounted on Jews, a bit like a man coming home after a bad day at work and kicking the dog and being irascible to his wife and children.<br /><br />The Nazis were not planning to exterminate them but to expel them and the Madagascar Plan is evidence of this. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan</a><br /><br />If this is so, Germany was really no worse than Britain during the Edict of Expulsion. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion</a><br /><br /><br />It would appear that <b>antisemitism is in fact a problem of Christianity</b>.<br /><br />I often asked myself why this Christian hatred of Jews is called antisemitism when the Arabs who are Muslims are also a Semitic race. I believe the answer is this: the hatred was not so much racial as ideological, since both Jews and Muslims because of their religion would necessarily deny the doctrine of the Trinity<br /><br />Enforcing belief of the Trinity was what the Spanish Inquisition was all about, was it not? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition</a><br /><br />Christians were not just nasty to Jews and Muslims, but also nasty to each other with their inter-denominational rivalries. Unitarian Christians and Quakers were also given a terrible time by the Established Church, Catholics were nasty to Protestants eg St Bartholomew's Day, and vice versa eg British in Ireland.<br /><br />It was only as recently as 1813 that it became legal to doubt the Trinity without the unpleasant consequence of losing one's job. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813</a><br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Toland">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Toland</a><br /><br /></p><blockquote class="tr_bq">In Toland's first book Christianity not Mysterious (1696), he argued that the divine revelation of the Bible contains no true mysteries; rather, all the dogmas of the faith can be understood and demonstrated by properly trained reason from natural principles. For this argument he was prosecuted by a grand jury in London. As he was a subject of the Kingdom of Ireland, members of the Parliament of Ireland proposed that he should be burnt at the stake, and in his absence three copies of the book were burnt by the public hangman in Dublin as the content was contrary to the core doctrines of the Church of Ireland. Toland bitterly compared the Protestant legislators to "Popish Inquisitors who performed that Execution on the Book, when they could not seize the Author, whom they had destined to the Flames".</blockquote><p><br />Britain, being the most successful military nation in the world at the time of WW1 felt they could take on anything, even the Germans on land. British generals probably longed for another war just to keep their troops on their toes and periodically battle-hardened.<br /><br />War was just a party for the world's most successful military nation. Indeed, every war was a party as far as the British considered and Britain was the No 1 Party Girl of the world. It was unthinkable not to gate crash or accept invitations for a "party". No respectable woman should accept every invitation or accede to every request to "party". In just the same way that a party girl easily becomes a fallen woman Britain has lost her status, respectability and reputation.<br /><br />Is British foreign policy now being run on saner principles?<br /><br />I would suggest not.<br /><br />The other point I want to make is that the reasons why Britain went to war was because it operated a system of government called democracy, which hasn't done it much good either.<br /><br />If Asquith had not been worried about what the voters would think, would he have entered WW1?<br /><br />If the democracy, Christianity and Liberalism are unsound ideologies to base our governments on, had we not better consider an alternative sooner rather than later?<br /><br />After Hubris, there can only be Nemesis and perhaps ISIS ...<br /><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HNhF28fzN9I/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HNhF28fzN9I?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div><p><br /><br /><a href="http://inconvenienthistory.com/3/4/3163#.U1AvoDkEweo.facebook">On the Avoidability of World War One</a><br /><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8LNg80XtsHU/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8LNg80XtsHU?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div><p><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/19/darkest-days-truth-behind-britains-rush-to-war-douglas-newton-review">https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/19/darkest-days-truth-behind-britains-rush-to-war-douglas-newton-review</a></p>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-41005862341991890022021-06-10T15:39:00.003+01:002021-06-10T15:43:14.868+01:00Narcissus died of narcissism<div>The definition of narcissism is the worship of oneself or one's ideas and opinions while refusing to engage when people challenge you.</div><div><br /></div><div>Referring to anything you post as "teachings" while refusing to explain or justify incoherent and irrational statements is an example. Calling people mad and foolish while being unable to give examples of people being mad or foolish is further evidence of narcissism, unless to respond to posts by a narcissist is in itself evidence of foolishness and madness. </div><div><br /></div><div>Let us hope that interest in the pathology if narcissism is not in itself foolishness and madness since being interested in the paths of foolishness and madness with a view to their prevention and cure does not make me a participant in and facilitator of madness and foolishness. </div><div><br /></div><div>I ask the question: Is narcissism a defect of character or a mental health issue?</div><div><br /></div><div>If most people not in government suffer from narcissism, what do you think will happen to your society if most people in government suffer from narcissism too? </div><div><br /></div><div>Is the cure to narcissism a proper understanding of your place in the world and what you are supposed to do? </div><div><br /></div><div>Does the proper understanding of this include being in a patriarchy maintained by obedience to God's laws in the Koran?</div><div><br /></div><div>If you disagree, do you have a better idea?</div><div><br /></div><div>If you disagree but don't have a better idea and cannot even formulate a rational argument, are you being honest, rational or moral?</div><div><br /></div><div>If you are none of those things, why should anyone listen to you?</div><div><br /></div><div>If you still insist that people should listen to you even if you are none of those things and cannot formulate a sound argument, are you in fact suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?</div><div><br /></div><div>Can narcissism be cured by belief in God?</div><div><br /></div><div>Yes, but only if they believe in the Abrahamic God as well and understand the reasons for the prohibition against idolatry. Christians and those from a Christian background are utterly unable to get their heads around idolatry or do not care to understand because they think they know better, which is further evidence of narcissism.</div><div><br /></div><div>Narcissism can destroy lives and civilisations because making dishonest, illogical and immoral decisions destroy lives. Not only that, the sheer amount of time and effort required to dislodge people from their narcissistic and nihilistic preoccupations and delusions is a problem in itself causing delays and obstructions on what should be a flat and easy path.</div><div><br /></div><div>The easiest way to spot a narcissist is that they suffer from the Sin of Pride which belief in God would correct. How they talk about God is an indication of their narcissism eg "God is my best friend and we have friendly chats all the time" suggests that they are not taking the Abrahamic God seriously enough. This is a peculiarly Christian failing because Christians have been indoctrinated into thinking of God as Jesus, their friendly neighbourhood deity.</div>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-71085241421478358052021-05-27T12:26:00.002+01:002021-05-27T12:26:59.141+01:00The condition of Western Man<div>You know a man is in arrested adolescence when he has opinions he cannot justify and you know a man is an unprincipled nihilist if he refuses to declare his principles.</div><div><br /></div><div>Good luck finding a principled man in the West though.</div><div><br /></div><div>In a matriarchy where nothing is fit for purpose, all men are lower in status to the unmarried mother, including POTUS.</div><div><br /></div><div>Not having moral principles is directly related to not having a religion and most Western men are atheists and nihilists, which explains why the political classes are atheists and nihilists with no principles to declare or defend, other than that of self-interest and expediency.</div><div><br /></div><div>Is it not obvious that the social, economic and political problems of the West are directly linked to the failure of its moral system that cannot even maintain minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents are married parents?</div><div><br /></div><div>The British Minister is a man who does not care to say how many illegitimate offspring he has.</div><div><br /></div><div>Of course it is the badge of a matriarchy to fall below the golden standard of marriage. It is precisely its purpose to desecrate the institutions of marriage and family.</div><div><br /></div><div>All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.</div><div><br /></div><div>All primitive, declining and extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.</div><div><br /></div><div>If Western governments corrected themselves now, Western civilisation as we know it would end, but that would be a good thing, wouldn't it?</div><div><br /></div><div>Error corrected must be better than error uncorrected.</div>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-87895316422773476592011-01-30T15:12:00.002+00:002011-01-30T15:12:54.479+00:00OFFICIAL: British women now BEYOND CRITICISM<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Theresa-May-Home-Secretary-Slaps-Down-Dominic-Raab-For-Calling-Feminists-Obnoxious-Bigots/Article/201101415913678?lpos=Politics_Third_Home_Page_Article_Teaser_Region__3&lid=ARTICLE_15913678_Theresa_May_Home_Secretary_Slaps_Down_Dominic_Raab_For_Calling_Feminists_Obnoxious_Bigots">http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Theresa-May-Home-Secretary-Slaps-Down-Dominic-Raab-For-Calling-Feminists-Obnoxious-Bigots/Article/201101415913678?lpos=Politics_Third_Home_Page_Article_Teaser_Region__3&amp;lid=ARTICLE_15913678_Theresa_May_Home_Secretary_Slaps_Down_Dominic_Raab_For_Calling_Feminists_Obnoxious_Bigots</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1350761/Women-entitled-council-house-partner-shouts.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1350761/Women-entitled-council-house-partner-shouts.html</a><br />
<br />
Theresa May tells Dominic Raab to shut the fuck up.<br />
<br />
British men's penises now collectively ripped off and stuffed into their mouths to prevent them from saying anything sexist at work. <br />
<br />
Principle now established that women must not be offended at work by men who will lose their jobs if they infringe this rule. <br />
<br />
We now live in a totalitarian state where women, who are responsible for half the social problems in this country, cannot now be criticised or offended. <br />
<br />
Proud of ourselves, are we? <br />
<br />
</div>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-9850045197551681172011-01-12T07:54:00.000+00:002011-01-12T07:54:30.597+00:00BBC TV = Crone TV: Women virtually unsackable in Britain's Demented Matriarchy<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMpUqg9WGB4_P31X9oEqaiziajV7pbFHm6vBFJwRdlfG1yw5VF3iR1HJeoq9v4czvEpnXkMHREOuoDny-ok4QKk6HjVxbUOwHXe4jg-65s99_-Jkxc182YGkVzM2zeNyax8_wzN5rFxdw/s1600/miriamoreilly.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMpUqg9WGB4_P31X9oEqaiziajV7pbFHm6vBFJwRdlfG1yw5VF3iR1HJeoq9v4czvEpnXkMHREOuoDny-ok4QKk6HjVxbUOwHXe4jg-65s99_-Jkxc182YGkVzM2zeNyax8_wzN5rFxdw/s320/miriamoreilly.jpg" width="231" /></a></div><br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1346089/Miriam-OReilly-wins-Countryfile-ageism-claim-discrimination-BBC.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1346089/Miriam-OReilly-wins-Countryfile-ageism-claim-discrimination-BBC.html</a><br />
<br />
<span data-jsid="text">Live by the sword, die by the sword. <br />
<br />
Get your job because of your looks, lose the job because you have lost them.</span><br />
<br />
<span data-jsid="text">Looks like BBC TV is going to be full of old crones reading the news and forecasting the weather in the years to come. When that happens no one will want to watch Crone TV and the BBC will lose influence and be held in hatre</span><span data-jsid="text">d, ridicule and contempt as will Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland. </span>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-38858650472118105202010-12-08T08:31:00.000+00:002010-12-08T08:31:44.829+00:00Father forbidden to take photos of own daughter's nativity play by cunting headmistress Jenny Pickering<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336139/Father-Lee-Ingram-broke-photo-ban-school-play-threatened-arrest.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336139/Father-Lee-Ingram-broke-photo-ban-school-play-threatened-arrest.html</a><br />
<br />
They just lifted this ban today, but fucking hell, do we want to carry on being an international laughing stock? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11945081">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11945081</a><br />
<br />
Only if you have shit for brains do you think we live in a free society.<br />
<br />
Down with the cunting matriarchy!Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-90418187517738283532010-10-01T07:12:00.001+01:002010-10-01T14:35:01.810+01:00More PC liberal-extremist legislation to protect useless employees<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/8035974/New-equality-laws-will-stop-employers-asking-about-health.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/8035974/New-equality-laws-will-stop-employers-asking-about-health.html</a><br />
<br />
Why don't we all hold a loaded gun to our heads and just pull the trigger?Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-14571483275526350932010-09-14T11:16:00.000+01:002010-09-14T11:16:00.337+01:00The British are "special"<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11287193">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11287193</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote><b>0810</b><br />
Ofsted says nearly half a million children in England, labelled with special needs have been wrongly diagnosed. Jo Shuter, headteacher at Quintin Kynaston School, a secondary school in North London and John Bangs, former assistant general secretary of the NUT <a class="inlineText" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8996000/8996510.stm">discuss the reasons for the high numbers.</a><br />
<br />
<b>0856</b><br />
At least on-in-five five school children in England are now classed as having special educational needs (SEN), according to Ofsted. Brian Lamb, who chaired an inquiry last year into whether parents had confidence in the SEN system, gives his reaction to the claims.. </blockquote><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8996000/8996159.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8996000/8996159.stm</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Special Needs Children should go to special schools. "Special" is a term of insult, now, is it not? A bit like "spastic". It is of course a middle class racket to give their children access to the character-deformining process of whingei<span class="text_exposed_show">ng for more money and "special" pleading. Notice how that head teacher <i>refused</i> repeatedly to answer John Humphreys when he repeatedly asked her if she gets more government funding if she has a specially large number of specially educationally needy children. What happens in effect is that these middle class specially educationally needy children get <i>butlers</i> to follow them around and minister to their special needs at the expense of the merely average, who are more likely to be useful citizens of the future. This teacher and middle class parent <i>racket</i> of Special Needs children disadvantages them. <br />
<br />
Give them more money, get more of the specially needy, ie educationally inadequate. Is that what we really want? </span><br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="text_exposed_show">Being the "special" people that the British are, we probably do. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><a href="http://www.educationlawyers.co.uk/">http://www.educationlawyers.co.uk</a>/ demonstrates what a fucking racket it all is. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><span style="font-size: large;">"Reward the inadequate! Punish the productive!" </span>this is the rallying liberal cry. </span><br />
<span class="text_exposed_show"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="text_exposed_show">Well, I guess there is no reason why parasites in turn can't have their own parasites too. When all the parasites in this country are busily feeding off each other in a unbreakable food chain of parasites who breed and eat other parasites, then this country will finally disappear up its own arsehole. </span>Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-69918228541215924082010-09-09T14:52:00.000+01:002010-09-09T14:52:59.887+01:00Montaigne, Grammar and Dangerously Dumbed-Down BritainReporter Tom Bateman spoke to the journalist and author Simon Heffer, who argues that most pupils have been left with "nothing but a random and often erroneous understanding of the components of language". <br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8983000/8983140.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8983000/8983140.stm</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Should children be taught a comprehensive understanding of English grammar?" The Today Programme asks.<br />
<br />
</blockquote><blockquote>"The greater part of the world's troubles are due to questions of grammar."</blockquote><br />
Only in Dangerously Dumbed-Down Britain is such an obvious question even asked, and discussed "seriously" by the supposedly most intelligent programme in the UK.Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7504833804674987589.post-42086002005858242922010-09-06T06:26:00.001+01:002010-09-06T06:49:10.747+01:00Girls! Go to university and have a 1 in 4 chance of becoming a lapdancer!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh71FtvEB28irhcsM6ROATD20Nw4CeD09MfzzYLHoAbvNsUw7E-uVWoBa3Kkw2GTzUcJQWQmeRvxCIKW9wy61SosYJpCbA3DY2ueCQi4ta8SgPbbzXip2kJKa9v0Iwo9P4ViB2n7AxL3ZQ/s1600/lap-dance.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh71FtvEB28irhcsM6ROATD20Nw4CeD09MfzzYLHoAbvNsUw7E-uVWoBa3Kkw2GTzUcJQWQmeRvxCIKW9wy61SosYJpCbA3DY2ueCQi4ta8SgPbbzXip2kJKa9v0Iwo9P4ViB2n7AxL3ZQ/s320/lap-dance.jpg" /></a></div><br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/one-in-four-lap-dancers-has-a-degree-study-finds-2063252.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/one-in-four-lap-dancers-has-a-degree-study-finds-2063252.html</a><br />
<br />
Do they have Lapdancing Studies at British universities? I would be surprised if these endlessly create university course "producers" hadn't already thought of it. <br />
<br />
If so, can male students study it too?<br />
<br />
If not, why not? (Guys, if they say no, you can sue them for sex discrimination.)<br />
<br />
Let's keep throwing taxpayers' money away to create useless degrees, useless graduates and a more basket case Britain! You know it makes sense!Claire Khawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com0